Quote:
Originally Posted by LordTakyon
Digital zoom, like the N95 has, can never compete with optical zoom...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sp00k
re: The pixelated zoom... As the N90 is Optical zoom (the lens assembly moves as in a zoom lens) and the N95 is Digital zoom (no moving lens optics during zooming, instead a steadily-decreasing surface-area of the CMOS detector is 'blown-up' to full size as the zoom increases), I'd be totally staggered if this had been able to be matched to the N90 display and correspondingly better end-results, by a firmware upgrade!!...
|
I definitely didn't understand that one.
My guess is you've confused the phones.
The phone you're talking about is probably the N93, but not the N90.
Although the camera module of N90 looks like it has optical zoom (as there's room for it), N90 doesn't have this feature actually.
Zoom in N90 is purely digital
Quote:
Originally Posted by sp00k
...I would point out that although the zoomed N95 display is badly pixelated, the resulting photo, after some very heavy processing in the phone, looks nowhere near as bad as the display, though admittedly, nothing like as sharp as a non-zoomed photo...
|
Indeed, the resulting photo is better than what you see on viewfinder.
But note i'm talking about video recording, not photo.In video mode, "what you see is what you get", unfortunatelly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sp00k
...Can I also point out that posting pics sized at 1024x768 plays havoc with screen formatting on a 1024x768 max. screen! Please stick to an absolute maximum pic size of 800x600, that way the page doesn't need to be constantly scrolled left & right to read the posts on the pages that the pics appear on! ... Thanks!
|
Sorry, i'll be using 800x600 then.
I've uploaded the pictures using
N95 and watched the results using Opera browser in the phone, and it was fine.
Hadn't checked through PC, as i use the phone to do almost everything in the internet.
I could have used lowest quality (640x480), but in
N95, 640x480 pictures are just terrible.There's a high level of degradation.
speaking about that, wasn't it fixed in latest firmware?